So the conversation about plausible future market size is a very important one, even with all the caveats. But if we’re going to engage it, it’s important that we frame it up well and see the question(s) with clear eyes even when the future is opaque. There’s still a lot of muddle in our public dialogue about carbon removal. People often mistakenly equate permanent carbon removal with direct air capture (DAC), or conflate carbon removal with carbon capture for emissions reduction purposes. Even the sophisticated Liebreich / Friedmann discussion had many moments of treating carbon removal and DAC interchangeably, as if the vast majority of the $200B hypothetical future market they were debating would be a DAC market.
Read the full article by Dai Ellis on The Great Unwind.
We are thrilled to be partnering with Stantec, a global leader in sustainable design and engineering, alongside the Palmdale Water District (PWD) to design a first-of-its-kind Advanced Water Treatment (AWT) demonstration facility with novel brine management technology in Palmdale, California. … Read More
PNNL will lead a team of 22 industry, community, governmental, and non-profit partners to accelerate measurement, reporting, and verification (MRV) approaches and technologies for mineralization-based carbon dioxide removal. … Read More
Capture6 was featured in a recent article by Petya Trendafilova of Carbon Herald as a top 20 DAC company. The article includes a brief description of Capture6’s origin story, technology, and global project pipeline. … Read More